Why can’t we just accept that every single earphone in the world is only as good as the subjective ear that uses it. So many times do you see earphones being criticized or praised at the cost of other people claiming one side or paid and the other isn’t. They either believe they’re paid to criticize the earphone by other brands or relationships, or they’re paid to only give praise by the earphone by it’s developer. Sure, I’m sure this can happen, but it doesn’t happen in the capacity that people claim.
I’ve seen some really bad reviews of people that never use the EQ never adjust for their ear preferences and just play the earphone out the box and think whatever sound they get is the whole story, when this is far from the truth. And it shouldn’t really be shocking because some audiophile out there hate the idea of EQ because it makes their money and expensive products advantage irrelevant with just a few adjustments on EQ’a by cheaper products. So they hate the idea of this because they claim it’s cheating and smarter to spending 1000’s on something you adjust for free and get the same results. Again, subjective views are plenty.
Rest assured, people, as sure as rainbows contain red in them, there will always be someone that doesn’t like the results of an earphone. And of course, this leads to people in comments attacking the view or defending it even without even owning the product. Most just want some reason to hate on the product because it makes them feel jealous that others like those that product and don’t talk about theirs anymore. Or they hate the review because the reviewer are the first people to not like what they believed to be loved by everyone. So obviously, the 10 people proir who stood with them know what they are talking about vs. this single reviewer who didn’t side with them. So obviously, the majority wins, right? NO!
Nothing can be just sum up as simple as this in most cases. If that was the case the being ignorant and not smart would be the right way to go, being that most people aren’t geniuses and / or smart, which is why it’s praised so much. If most people were like Albert Einstein…he wouldn’t be special, would he?
Everything is subjective, all the way down to the fit and feel of earphones. We need to stop believing that a review can justify what we hear and or feel with our own ears or that their review can remove what we already love with our ears. At the end of the day I buy with my money, not anyone else’s. I have the right solely to determine what is good, not someone else. Too many of us believe what others say, and its fine to a point until we allow it dictate what is good or wrong with the product for us over our own experience.
I’ve seen people completely happy with their choice and allow someone to bring up one thing it didn’t do right for them and the other person will turn around and test that one thing even though they have no need for that function or action, and all of sudden …it can’t do this so the product they were happy with now must be returned. Stupid, in my opinion, but again, my subjective opinion:))
The Az100 are an incredible earphone and my #1 earphone because they deliver on what they say. Love the battery life ability’s, because I was sick of higher cost earphones and a less battery life. I touch controls customization vs higher cost earphones not having that ability(i.e., pi8). Love the actual useful app vs. higher cost earphones. Love the anc ability on phone calls that nobody does better than this at any price. I love the tonality, timbre, dynamics , mids, vocals, and bass on these things. They are for me, and I have no need for them to be for you to justify why they work for me. Nor should you be interested the other way around if they don’t work for you. But let your opinion be yours based on your experience, not others.
Tech-N-Things 